Confidential Enquiries · Institutional Counterparties Only
Insights 29 May 2026 ~5 minute read

Can You Borrow Against Restricted or Lock-Up Shares?

Often, yes — and that is precisely why founders and insiders use the structure. A pledge is not a sale, and the constraints that prevent selling restricted shares do not always prevent borrowing against them.

The most common question from a founder shortly after a listing is some version of: my shares are locked up, so what can I actually do with them? The answer is more permissive than most expect. A securities-backed loan releases capital against the position without a disposal, and the restrictions that govern the sale of restricted, insider, and lock-up shares are not the same restrictions that govern a pledge of them.

That said, “often yes” is not “always yes.” Whether a specific position can support a loan depends on the precise terms of the lock-up agreement, the holder’s status under securities law, and the disclosure and insider-dealing regime of the listing market. Each is assessed at the structuring stage.

Post-IPO lock-up shares

A lock-up agreement restricts an insider from selling shares for a defined period after a listing — commonly ninety to one hundred and eighty days, sometimes longer. The critical question for financing is whether the lock-up restricts only a sale, or also a pledge. Many lock-up agreements are drafted around disposals and transfers; some expressly permit a pledge as collateral, and some require the consent of the underwriters. Where a pledge is permitted — or consent can be obtained — a loan can be arranged against locked-up shares while the lock-up runs, releasing liquidity that an outright sale could not.

This is one of the defining use cases for the instrument. The holder is contractually unable to sell, has substantial paper wealth, and a real need for capital — for diversification, a commitment, or the next venture. A pledge structured to respect the lock-up bridges precisely that gap. See Pre-IPO & Lock-Up Bridges.

Insider and affiliate shares

Shares held by directors, officers, and affiliates carry restrictions independent of any lock-up. In the United States, affiliate sales are governed by the volume, manner-of-sale, and notice conditions of Rule 144; equivalent regimes apply in other markets. These rules constrain how and when restricted shares may be sold into the market. A pledge as loan collateral is a different act, and one that — structured correctly — can provide liquidity without the dribble-out constraints of an open-market disposal.

The insider dimension does, however, introduce two hard constraints. First, the holder must not be in possession of material non-public information at the point of entering the transaction; the firm does not request such information, and indicative terms are established from publicly-available details of the position. Second, the pledge itself is, in most markets, a disclosable event for a substantial holder — which makes the timing and language of disclosure a structural matter, not an afterthought.

What the structure has to respect

A loan against restricted or lock-up shares is feasible when the following conditions are satisfied:

  • i
    The pledge is permitted. The lock-up agreement, insider policy, or shareholders’ agreement permits a pledge as collateral, or the necessary consent can be obtained.
  • ii
    Disclosure is mapped. The substantial-shareholder pledge disclosure is timed and worded against the trading calendar and the issuer’s blackout windows, so the market reads it as routine.
  • iii
    No material non-public information. The holder is not in possession of inside information when the transaction is entered; the firm does not request it.
  • iv
    The recourse profile fits the holder. For a holder whose wealth is concentrated in the restricted position, a non-recourse or limited-recourse structure bounds the downside. See recourse profiles.

The practical answer

For most founders, controlling shareholders, and senior insiders, the practical answer is that restricted and lock-up shares can support a loan more readily than they can support a sale — which is the entire point. The work is in confirming that the pledge is permitted, structuring the disclosure, and calibrating the recourse profile to the holder’s concentration. None of this is legal advice; the holder’s own counsel confirms the position against the specific agreements and the applicable regime.

Written by

Adrien Fontaine

Principal, Markets & Coverage

Adrien Fontaine covers the firm’s exchange relationships and per-market eligibility across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific. He advises holders on the regulatory framework, disclosure thresholds, and cross-currency considerations of financing positions on individual exchanges.

Global equity markets · Cross-currency financing · Exchange regulation · Substantial-shareholder disclosure

FAQ
Common Questions

On this topic.

Q · 01 Can I borrow against shares that are still in a post-IPO lock-up?
Often, yes — if the lock-up agreement permits a pledge as collateral, or if underwriter consent can be obtained. Many lock-ups restrict sales and transfers but treat a pledge differently. Where a pledge is permitted, a loan can be arranged against locked-up shares while the lock-up runs, releasing liquidity that an outright sale could not.
Q · 02 Do insider-trading and Rule 144 restrictions prevent a stock loan?
Not in themselves. Rule 144 and equivalent regimes constrain how restricted and affiliate shares may be sold into the market; a pledge as loan collateral is a different act. The hard constraints are that the holder must not possess material non-public information when entering the transaction, and that the pledge is typically a disclosable event requiring careful timing.
Q · 03 Will pledging my restricted shares have to be disclosed?
In most major markets, a pledge by a substantial shareholder is a disclosable event under the beneficial-ownership regime. This is managed, not avoided: the disclosure is timed and worded against the trading calendar and the issuer’s blackout windows so that the market reads it as routine financing rather than a distress signal.

A specific position to discuss?

Submit a confidential enquiry. A senior principal will respond within one business day.